Mitigating Fraud in Social Assistance: Enhancing the Role of Government External Auditor

Authors

  • Mina Jayanti Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Agustin Fadjarenie Universitas Mercu Buana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v4i2.40

Keywords:

Risk Assessment, Professional Skepticism, Fraud Detection, Social Assistance, Accountability

Abstract

Accountability in distributing social assistance funds is vital for transparency and reducing irregularities. This study explores how risk assessment, auditor competence, and professional skepticism enhance auditors’ ability to detect irregularities in government social assistance programs. The results indicate these factors significantly improve auditors’ expertise, highlighting their crucial role in public sector audits. This research is unique in addressing the challenges of auditing social assistance programs, an area often overlooked. Practical implications include improving audit practices through better risk evaluation, competence development, and fostering professional skepticism. Strengthening these aspects can enhance governance and public trust in managing social assistance funds.

References

Agustin, F., & Septiawan, H. P. (2023). The Effect of Experience, Workload, and Professional Skepticism at the Inspectorate General of Ministery of Social Affairs of The Republic of Indonesia. The International Journal of Business and Management, 11.

Agustina, F., Nurkholis, N., & Rusydi, M. (2021). Auditors’ professional skepticism and fraud detection. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214

Alsabahi, M. A., Bahador, K. M. K., & Saat, R. M. (2021). Skills development factors of information technology competency among external auditors. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2021040102

Aminudin, M. R., & Suryandari, D. (2016). Factors Affecting Auditor’s Ability in Detecting Fraud through Professional Scepticism. Accounting Analysis Journal, 5(4).

Arens, A., Hogan, C., Beasley, M., & Elder, R. (2016). Auditing and Assurance Services: An integrated Approach. In Sixteenth Edition.

Avkiran, N. K., Ringle, C. M., & Low, R. (2018). Monitoring transmission of systemic risk: Application of partial least squares structural equation modeling in financial stress testing. Journal of Risk, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2018.386

Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of Auditor Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491243

Fadhilah, H. (2018). The Influence of Professional Skepticism and Time Budget Pressure of Auditor’s Ability to Detect Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Survey on Senior Auditor In Big Four Firms). International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 16(1).

Golicha, K. J., & Onsiro, M. (2022). Assessing the of Effect of Risk Assessment on Detection and Prevention of Fraud in Banking Sector in Kenya. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(17), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i1730639

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). An Overview of Recent and Emerging Developments in PLS-SEM. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares SEM, June.

IAASB. (2009). 2009 IAASB Annual Report.

IAPI. (2021). Standar Kompetensi Profesi Akuntan Publik 2021. Https://Iapi.or.Id/Standar-Kompetensi-Profesi-Akuntan-Publik-2021/.

Indriani, N., Koeswayo, P. S., & Irawady, C. (2022). The Effect of Competence and Independence on Fraud Detection (Empirical Study at The West Java Representatives of The Audit Board of The Republic of Indonesia). Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v5i2.38367

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership, 77–132. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674274051-006

Kartika, D., & Pramuka, B. A. (2019). The Influence of Competency, Independency, and Professionalism on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v2i2.58

Knapp, C. A., & Knapp, M. C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00005-2

Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. American Sociological Review, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.2307/2089062

Nuraisya, R. S., & Chariri, A. (2016). The Effect of Audit Procedures and Auditors’ Experience on Auditors’ Responsibility in Detecting Fraud: Javanese Culture as a Moderating Factor. Samrtceic - AGBA 2016, 53(9).

Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Ting, F. C. H., & Memon, M. A. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 4(October), 291.

Said, L. L., & Munandar, A. (2018). THE INFLUENCE OF AUDITOR’S PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM AND COMPETENCE ON FRAUD DETECTION: THE ROLE OF TIME BUDGET PRESSURE. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2018.06

Sanjaya Adi Putra, G., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The effect of auditor experience, type of personality and fraud auditing training on auditors’ ability in fraud detecting with professional skepticism as a mediation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n2.604

Susanto, H., Mulyani, S., Azis, H. A., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2019). The level of fraud detection affected by auditor competency using digital forensic support. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(Extra5).

Xu, G., Yang, C., & Fukofuka, P. T. (2023). Professional Skepticism in Practice: An Analysis of Auditors’ Stories. Auditing, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-2021-043

Z. D. Siahay, A., C. Seralurin, Y., Ervina, M. T., & Pattiasina, V. (2023). Professional Competence and Skepticism on Audit Quality. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i2.114

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

Issue

Section

Articles