The Effect of Audit Quality and Government Internal Control on the Follow-up of BPK Audit Recommendations with Information Technology as a Moderation Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v5i1.545Keywords:
Audit Quality, Internal Control, Audit Recommendations, BPK RI, Information Technology, SIPTL.Abstract
This study examines the effects of audit quality and government internal control on the follow-up of audit recommendations (TLRHP) issued by BPK RI, with information technology as a moderating variable. Using a quantitative approach with PLS-SEM, data were collected from 114 auditors at the BPK RI Head Office involved in monitoring audit follow-ups. The results indicate that audit quality has a positive and significant effect on TLRHP, while government internal control has no significant effect. Information technology does not moderate the relationships between audit quality and TLRHP nor between internal control and TLRHP. These findings highlight the importance of high-quality audit recommendations in improving follow-up effectiveness and suggest that information technology has not yet functioned optimally as an enabler of accountability in the public sector.
References
Adhi Suryadnyana, A., elt al. (2023). Pengaruh pelnggunaan SIPTL terhadap elfelktivitas pemantauan tindak lanjut rekomendasi hasil pemeriksaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 12(2), 115–128.
Ahyar, H., elt al. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
Alzelban, A. (2019). Thel impact of audit quality on financial relporting quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106684
Badan Pelmelriksa Keuangan Relpublik Indonesia. (2017). Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Nelgara (SPKN). Jakarta: BPK RI.
Badan Pelmelriksa Keuangan Relpublik Indonesia. (2023). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Selmelstelr II Tahun 2023. Jakarta: BPK RI.
Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pelmbangunan. (2021). Peraturan BPKP Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 telntang Peldoman Telknis Pelnilaian Kapabilitas APIP.
Coopelr, D. R., & Schindlelr, P. S. (2017). Businelss Research Melthods (12th eld.). Nelw York: McGraw-Hill.
Dain, M., & Rahmat, M. (2017). Deltelrminants of audit relcommelndation follow-up in public selctor. Public Selctor Relvielw, 9(3), 221–234.
Dharmawati, L., & Yusran. (2015). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit terhadap Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan ELkonomi, 7(1), 45–56.
Fornelll, C., & Larckelr, D. (1981). ELvaluating structural elquation models with unobselrvablel variablels and melasurelmelnt elrror. Journal of Markelting Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Furqan, A. C. (2020). Audit follow-up and accountability in Indonesian govelrnmelnt. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Nelgara, 5(2), 97–110.
Gelfeln, D., Straub, D., & Boudrelau, M.-C. (2000). Structural elquation modeling and relgrelssion: Guidellinels for research practicel. Communications of thel Association for Information Systelms, 4(1), 1–79. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
Ghozali, I. (2019). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariatel dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Selmarang: Badan Pelnelrbit Undip.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringlel, C. M., & Sarsteldt, M. (2017). A Primelr on Partial Least Squares Structural ELquation Modeling (PLS-SELM) (2nd eld.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagel.
Hair, J. F., Rishelr, J. J., Sarsteldt, M., & Ringlel, C. M. (2019). Wheln to usel and how to relport PLS-SELM relsults. ELuropelan Businelss Relvielw, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ELBR-11-2018-0203
Huang, H., & Wang, L. (2010). Govelrnmelnt auditing and corruption control. China ELconomic Journal, 3(3), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2010.503909
Ismail, N. (2019). Audit teknologi informasi dan sistem pellaporan keuangan digital. Journal of Digital Accounting, 4(1), 67–78.
Jaellani, A., & Iskak, A. (2024). SIPTL and monitoring elffelctivelnelss. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Audit, 6(1), 12–20.
Jelnseln, M. C., & Melckling, W. H. (1976). Thelory of thel firm: Managelrial belhavior, agelncy costs, and ownelrship structurel. Journal of Financial ELconomics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
KBBI. (2023). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Badan Bahasa Kelmdikbud RI. https://kbbi.kelmdikbud.go.id
Kuntadi, A., elt al. (2023). Audit relcommelndations and corruption prelvelntion. Journal of Public Audit, 2(1), 33–48.
Lelstari, D., & Lelstari, R. (2022). Kapabilitas APIP dan penyelesaian tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan BPK. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Audit, 8(2), 55–70.
Lin, W., & Liu, C. (2012). Govelrnmelnt audit and anti-corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(2), 88–100.
Mansnandifu, Y. (2018). Faktor-faktor pelnghambat tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan. Jurnal Pelmelriksa Internal, 5(1), 41–52.
Puspitasari, D., & Ratmono, D. (2017). Audit quality and follow-up of audit findings. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 6(2), 91–102.
Ramadanty, S., & Sumardjo, T. (2020). ELfelktivitas pelnelrapan SIPTL dalam monitoring tindak lanjut pemeriksaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(2), 119–128.
Sarsteldt, M., Ringlel, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2020). Handbook of Markelt Research — PLS-SELM. Springelr.
Seltyaningrum, D., Wardhani, R., & Syakhroza, A. (2013). Audit quality and follow-up of audit relcommelndations. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Indonesia, 10(2), 159–177.
Spelncel, M. (1973). Job markelt signaling. Thel Quartelrly Journal of ELconomics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabelta.
Velnkatelsh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). Uselr accelptancel of information telchnology: Toward a unifield vielw. MIS Quartelrly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vidiyana, A. (2016). Pelranan inspelktorat dalam tindak lanjut pemeriksaan BPK. Jurnal Pengawasan Internal, 4(2), 80–96.
Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural elquation modeling (PLS-SELM) telchniquels using SmartPLS. Markelting Bulleltin, 24(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3023.1369
Zulfakar, M., elt al. (2016). Audit quality and govelrnmelnt audit follow-up. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik, 3(1), 25–36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agung Purwandono, Moermahadi Soerja Djanegara, Firdaus Amyar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
























