Students' Experiences in Navigating Cognitive Overload During Blended Learning Transitions

Faridl Musyadad; Sefrianus Naiheli; Nia Jusniani

doi:10.55927/jeda.v5i1.594

Authors

Faridl Musyadad IKIP PGRI Wates, Yogyakarta
Sefrianus Naiheli Universitas Aryasatya Deo Muri, Kupang
Nia Jusniani Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v5i1.594

Keywords:

Cognitive Overload, Blended Learning, Student Experience, Learning Design, Higher Education

Abstract

The rapid transition to a blended learning environment has fundamentally changed the student learning experience, often increasing cognitive demands and the risk of cognitive overload.This study explores students' experiences in managing cognitive overload during blended learning transitions, with special attention to learning design, shifts in learning modes, and self-regulated learning strategies. This research uses a qualitative approach, with data collection through in-depth interviews and reflective journals of learning from undergraduate students who participated in mixed lectures in various disciplines.However, students also show adaptive strategies, such as prioritization of learning assignments, selective engagement with learning resources, and the development of metacognitive awareness to manage cognitive demands effectively. The findings of this study confirm the important role of coherent learning design, pedagogical alignment, and institutional support in mitigating cognitive overload in blended learning contexts. This study contributes to the development of educational research studies by providing a deeper understanding of students' cognitive experiences and offers practical implications for educators and policymakers in designing a more cognitively sustainable blended learning environment.

References

Adinda, D. (2020). Teaching and instructional design approaches to enhance students' self-directed learning in blended learning environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.004

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Ayres, P. (2020). Cognitive load theory: Implications for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09503-3

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2021). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00249-0

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Broadbent, J. (2023). Self-regulated learning in higher education: A review of theoretical perspectives and implications for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09670-9

Chang, G., Sukumaran, S., & Wang, J. (2025). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement in blended learning environments. Environment–Behavior Proceedings Journal, 10(29), 1–10.

Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Xu, J. (2021). Multitasking, cognitive load, and learning performance in online learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2015–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09983-2

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108966900

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data at scale. SAGE Publications.

Jansen, D., Schuwer, R., Teixeira, A., & Aydin, C. H. (2023). Higher education students' learning perception in the blended learning community of inquiry. Journal of Computers in Education, 10(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00290-y

Kara, M., Erdoğdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2022). Students' experiences in self-regulated learning in blended learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 33–45.

Lobos, K., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Sáez, D. (2024). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance in blended learning contexts. Computers & Education, 198, 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104758

Lowenthal, P. R., Borup, J., West, R. E., & Archambault, L. (2023). Thinking beyond content delivery: Instructional design for engagement in blended and online learning. Distance Education, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2156063

Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2022). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10006-2

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Surbakti, K., Umboh, H., Pong, B., & Dara, M. (2024). Cognitive load and student engagement in blended learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 9(2), 235–247.

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113210

World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Zidi, C., Jalaludin, N. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2025). Does cognitive load moderate students' learning engagement mechanism in blended learning? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 1–12.

Zou, D. (2025). Blended learning in higher education: Trends, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 1–18.