Research Engagement of Faculty in Higher Education Institutions

Geryl D. Cataraja; Elvenne M. Bate; Maricris Potot

doi:10.55927/jeda.v5i1.622

Authors

Geryl D. Cataraja Palompon Institute of Technology
Elvenne M. Bate Palompon Institute of Technology
Maricris Potot Palompon Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v5i1.622

Keywords:

Faculty Attitudes, Academic Research, Institutional Support, Research Engagement, Higher Education

Abstract

This study examines faculty attitudes toward research, exploring their perceptions, challenges, and motivations in engaging with scholarly activities. Using a qualitative approach, the study interviewed faculty members to assess their perspectives on the significance of research, institutional support, and the barriers they face. Findings indicate that while faculty generally recognize the importance of research in professional growth and academic development, factors such as workload, lack of resources, and limited institutional incentives hinder active participation. The study highlights the need for enhanced support systems, including training, funding opportunities, and workload adjustments, to foster a more research-driven academic culture. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and academic leaders aiming to strengthen research engagement among faculty members.

References

Aguillo, I. F., Bar-Ilan, J., Levene, M., & Ortega, J. L. (2010). Comparing university rankings. Scientometrics, 85(1), 243-256.

Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. *Academic Medicine*, 80(3), 225-237.

Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.

Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29(3), 261-273.

Deem, R., & Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education, 54(1), 115-133.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.

Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 518-542.

Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964).

Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Wiley.

McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19-35.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). *Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. SAGE Publications.

Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing faculty productivity: Problems and prospects in a changing environment. Teachers College Record, 94(2), 185-210.

Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? *Organization Studies*, 31(11), 1459-1483