Initiative Attitude Moderated by Achievement Motivation and Corrective Attitude towards Employee Performance at the Customs Supervision and Service Office Type Madya Customs B Samarinda

Afriansyah Afriansyah; Tetra Hidayati; Siti Maria

doi:10.55927/ijbae.v4i5.389

Authors

Afriansyah Afriansyah Universitas Mulawarman
Tetra Hidayati Universitas Mulawarman
Siti Maria Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v4i5.389

Keywords:

Initiative Attitude, Achievement Motivation, Corrective Attitude, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of initiative attitudes on the performance of employees with achievement motivation and corrective attitude as moderation variables at the Customs and Excise Supervision and Service Office of Intermediate Type B Customs B. Samarinda. The approach used is quantitative using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling, with a total of 68 employees. The results of the study show that the attitude of initiative has a positive and significant effect on employee performance. However, achievement motivation is not able to significantly moderate the relationship between attitude of initiative and employee performance. Similarly, corrective attitudes also do not significantly moderate the relationship between initiative attitudes and employee performance. These findings show that performance improvement is more directly dependent on strengthening the attitude of initiative than on the effect of interaction with the moderation variable. The implications of these results lead to the need to strengthen the work system that encourages direct initiative in the daily tasks of Samarinda Customs employees.

References

Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. 2018. Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911

Alfetah, A., Alferjany, M., Salama, A. A. M., Amuna, Y. M. A., Al Shobaki, M. J., Naser, S. S. A., & Abu, S. S. 2018. The Relationship between Correcting Deviations in Measuring Performance and Achieving the Objectives of Control-The Islamic University as a Model. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS), 2 (1), 74–89. www.ijeais.org74

Andari. 2022. Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Inisiatif Individu Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi terhadap SGP di Bank Mandiri Area Semarang Pahlawan). Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Anis Nordin, N., & Mahadi, N. 2021. Understanding the Impact of Attitude on Organizational Performance. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy, 15 (2), 38–45.

Astuti, W., & Amalia, L. 2021. Performance: the Moderating Role of Psychology Capital and the Mediating Role. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan, 14 (2), 102–128.

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. 2013. The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38 (1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0479

Berson, Y., Waldman, D. A., & Pearce, C. L. 2016. Enhancing our understanding of vision in organizations: Toward an integration of leader and follower processes. Organizational Psychology Review, 6 (2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386615583736

Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. 2017. Principles of Human Resource Management (16th ed.). South-Western.

Dessler, G. 2020. Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.

DJBC. 2023. (PENGUATAN) BUDAYA ORGANISASI.

Ghozali, I. 2018. Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Squares (PLS). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hasan, M. M., & Chowdhury, S. A. 2023. Assessing The Influence of Training and Skill Development Initiatives on Employee Performance: A Case Study of Private Banks in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Malaysian Business Management Journal, 2 (2), 74–79.

Khalil, J., Horgan, J., & Zeuthen, M. 2022. The Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34 (3), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1699793

Latan, H., & Ghozali, I. 2016. Partial Least Square konsep, metode dan aplikasi menggunakan WarpPLS 5.0. In Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Universitas Diponegoro.

Maslow, A. H. 2018. Motivation and Personality: Motivasi dan Kepribadian (A. Fawaid & Maufur (trans.)). Cantrik Pustaka.

Mathis, & Jackson. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi 9 (J. Sadeli & B. P. Hie (trans.)). Salemba Empat.

Maya, E. P. W. L. 2019. Analisa Pengaruh Motivasi, Inisiatif, Kompensasi, Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Terhadap Rendahnya Kinerja Tenaga Pemasar PT Bank Brisyariah Tbk Kantor Cabang Surabaya Diponegoro. Arthavidya Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 21 (2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.37303/a.v21i2.135

Mclelland. 2016. McClell and ’ s Theory of Motivation. 1–7.

Meinawati, R. 2007. Peranan Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pada Agen Yang Bekerja di Kantor Operasional Pondok Gede dan Kalimalang AJB Bumiputera 1912 Cabang Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Psikologi Vol, 5 (1), 1.

Napitupulu, A. F. 2019. Hubungan Motivasi Berprestasi Dengan Kinerja Perawat Di Rumah Sakit Hidayah - Deli Tua. Universitas Medan Area.

Naway, F. A. 2018. Organizational Citizenship Behavior dalam Kinerja Organisasi. In Zahir Publishing.

Nicky1, S. K., Sondakh2, J. J., & Wokas, H. R. N. 2021. Pengaruh Sikap dan Emosi Karyawan Terhadap Kinerja Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Pada PT.PLN (Persero) Area Manado. Emba, 9 (1), 307–314.

Plutzer, M. B. B. and E. 2021. Employee Performance Reviewed From Initiative, Work Discipline, Work Motivation, And Employee Readiness For Change In The Central Java Ii Regional Office Of The Directorate General Of Taxes. International Journal of Economic Busines and Accounting Reseacrh, 2021 (3), 6.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. 2022. Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Santoso, B. 2021. Analisis Potensi Effort dan Inisiatif dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Job performance dengan Variabel Mediasi Moral of job pada Pondok Pesantren Riyadlul Jannah Mojokerto. JEBDEER: Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business Development and Economic Educations Research, 3 (1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.32616/jbr.v3i1.282

Sihombing, P. L. T., & Batoebara, M. U. 2019. Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Pencapaian Tujuan Perusahaandi Cv Multi Baja Medan. Jurnal Publik Reform UNDHAR MEDAN, 6, 1–16.

Sugiyono. 2021. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kulaitatif, dan R&D, dan Penelitian Pendidikan). In Alfabeta. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, P. D. 2019. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&d dan Penelitian Pendidikan). In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.

Syahidin, R. F., Sudarwati, S., & Damayanti, R. 2021. Employee Performance Reviewed From Knowledge Management, Attitude and Training At Sahid Jaya Hotel Solo. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5 (1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i1.1828

Wang, J., Shi, W., Liu, G., & Zhou, L. 2021. Moving Beyond Initiative: The Reconceptualization and Measurement of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (September), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640107

Welbourne, T. M., & Schlachter, S. 2019. Engagement Intent: Role Theory Perspectives for Balancing Individual and Firm-Level Engagement Outcomes. Compensation & Benefits Review, 51 (4), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368719898932

Wihler, A., Blickle, G., Ellen III, B., Hochwarter, W., & Ferris, G. 2017. Personal Initiative and Job Performance Evaluations. Journal of Management, 43, 1388–1420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314552451

Wijaya, A. 2019. Metode penelitian menggunakan smart PLS 03 (1st ed.). Innosain.

Wisnu. 2023. Kemampuan Inisiatif: Pengertian, Manfaat, Contoh, Hingga Cara Melatihnya. Myrobin.Id. https://myrobin.id/untuk-pekerja/kemampuan-inisiatif/

Yasmeardi, F., Rizke, D., & Fernando, N. 2019. Pengaruh inisiatif terhadap kinerja pegawai pada kantor camat koto tangah Kota padang. Jurnal Public Administration, Buisness and Rural Development Planning, 1 (2), 46–55.