Exploring EFL Students’ Peer Evaluation Practices in Collaborative Projects: Patterns, Biases, and Pedagogical Implications

Authors

  • Lutfi Istikharoh Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v4i3.242

Keywords:

Peer Evaluation, Group Work, EFL Students, TEFL Classroom, Assessment Literacy

Abstract

This study investigated how EFL students in a teacher education program engage in peer evaluation during collaborative group projects. Using a structured rubric across five dimensions—ideas, responsibility, feedback, cooperation, and participation—591 peer ratings were analyzed to reveal patterns in evaluative behavior. The results indicate a tendency toward leniency and uniform high scores, driven by sociocultural expectations of harmony and positive bias, including halo effects. Variability in scoring and limited qualitative justification suggest a need for improved assessment literacy and rubric interpretation. The discussion highlights the influence of cultural norms and the limitations of student evaluative skills, arguing that peer assessment should be supported by structured training and reflective practice. The study concludes that while peer evaluation holds promise for promoting critical thinking and accountability in TEFL settings, its educational value depends heavily on how it is integrated into pedagogy. Implications are drawn for curriculum design, instructional scaffolding, and the professional development of pre-service English teachers.

References

Ali Salami, F., & Mastour Alharthi, R. (2022). Improving Language Assessment Literacy for In-Service Saudi EFL Teachers. Arab World English Journal, 13(3), 536–554. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.35

Alqarni, T., & Alshakhi, A. (2021). The impact of negotiation as a social practice on efl writing peer assessment sessions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1334–1341. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1110.23

Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative Learning Techniques (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cartney, P. (2010). Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing thegap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003632381

Cohen, E. G. ., & Lotan, R. A. . (2014). Designing groupwork : strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Teachers College Press.

El-Mowafy, A. (2010). Using peer assessment of fieldwork to enhance students’ practical training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 223–241.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395

Farahian, M., & Ebadi, S. (2023). Collaborative digital writing and metacognitive knowledge in writing among TEFL students: the mediating role of online knowledge sharing. In Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 18).

Hapsari, A., & Fatmasari, T. A. (2022). Online Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in the Process of Writing Undergraduate Thesis: A Survey Study. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 8(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v8i2.24333

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Recent Consequences: Using Dimension Scores in Theory and Research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–30.

Kizil, V. (2019). Peer Assessment in EFL Writing Classes. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 5(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.560099

Li, L., & Gao, F. (2015). Effect of Peer assessment on Project Performance of Students at Effect of Peer assessment on Project Performance of Students at Different Learning Levels Different Learning Levels. Visual Communications and Technology Education Faculty Publications, 33. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/vcte_pub/33

Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing Talk Moves as Tools: Professional Development Approaches for Academically Productive Discussions. In Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue (pp. 347–361). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_27

Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020). A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 30). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329

Prastikawati, E. F., Mujiyanto, Y., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2024). Teaching Practicum: Does It Impact to Pre-service EFL Teachers’ Language Assessment Literacy? World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p242

Rahmatillah, R., & Fajrita, R. (2022). Journal of Social and Policy Issues Analyzing Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Teaching. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35308/xxxxx

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). APPROACHES AND METHODS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. In Instructional Science (Vol. 18).

Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2009). Peer-assessing peers’ contribution to EFL group presentations. RELC Journal, 40(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688209105868

Sohrabi, Z., Ghanbari, N., & Abbasi, A. (2022). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of writing assessment literacy: a countrywide study. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00172-7

Steensels, C., Leemans, L., Buelens, H., Laga, E., Lecoutere, A., Laekemen, G., & Simoens, S. (2006). Peer assessment: A valuable tool to differentiate between student contributions to group work? Pharmacy Education, 6(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15602210600662279

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Thị, N., & Lộc, H. (2016). DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAMESE PRE-SERVICE EFL TEACHERS’ ASSESSMENT LITERACY.

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249

Wardani, W. O., Sukyadi, D., & Purnawarman, P. (2021, April 16). Exploring Teacher Assessment Literacy in EFL Classroom. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305253

Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002

Published

2025-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles