The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education, Proactive Personality, and a Sustainable Environment on the Validity and Reliability of a Green Entrepreneurial Intention Instrument

Authors

  • Wening Patmi Rahayu Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Rachmad Hidayat Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Dede Rusmana Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Lutfi Asnan Qodri Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v4i3.253

Keywords:

Green Entrepreneurial, Entrepreneurship Education, Proactive Personality, Sustainable Environment

Abstract

This study aims to design and test the validity of a green entrepreneurship intention measurement instrument, focusing on the influence of entrepreneurship education, proactive personality, and sustainable environment. A preliminary test of the instrument was conducted on 30 students at Malang State University in May–June 2025. Statistical analysis using Pearson Product Moment correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient showed that this instrument has very strong psychometric characteristics. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.695 to 0.939 (p<0.001), while Cronbach's alpha reached 0.984—a figure that reflects a very high level of reliability and internal consistency. These findings indicate that the instrument is suitable for use as a valid and consistent measuring tool in further research on the driving factors of green entrepreneurship, as well as a practical reference for educators and policymakers in assessing and improving sustainable entrepreneurship capacity.

References

Abdel Hadi, S., Kersting, M., Klehe, U. C., Deckenbach, M., & Häusser, J. A. (2023). Relationships between proactive personality, work locus of control, and vocational satisfaction: the role of level of education. Heliyon, 9(2), e13283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13283

Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221.

Basso, A. (2017). The appeal to robustness in measurement practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 65, 57–66.

Ben Youssef, A., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(November 2017), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.003

Berndt, A. E. (2020a). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226.

Berndt, A. E. (2020b). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226.

Buntin, G. D. (2020a). Developing a primary sampling program. In Handbook of sampling methods for arthropods in agriculture (pp. 99–115). CRC Press.

Buntin, G. D. (2020b). Developing a primary sampling program. In Handbook of sampling methods for arthropods in agriculture (pp. 99–115). CRC Press.

Cash, P., Isaksson, O., Maier, A., & Summers, J. (2022). Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design Studies, 78, 101077.

Chen, Y., Chen, M., & Hu, T. (2025). Designing a sustainable-resilient vaccine cold chain network in uncertain environments. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 194, 108936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108936

Chu, C.-C., & Chou, C.-Y. (2024). Hybrid work stressors and psychological withdrawal behavior: A moderated mediation model of emotional exhaustion and proactive personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 155, 104053. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104053

Cortina, J. M. (2020). On the whys and hows of quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 19–29.

Dai, Y., Qin, S., Tang, Y. M., & Hou, J. (2024). Fostering employees’ innovative behavior: The importance of proactive personality and work-related flow. Acta Psychologica, 246, 104278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104278

Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(August), 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092

Din, S. U., Khan, M. A., Farid, H., & Rodrigo, P. (2023). Proactive personality: A bibliographic review of research trends and publications. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112066. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.112066

Escorcia Hernández, J. R., Torabi Moghadam, S., & Lombardi, P. (2024). Urban sustainability in social housing environments: A spatial impact assessment in Bogotá, Colombia. Cities, 154, 105392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105392

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hu, B., Zhou, P., Zhang, L. P., Şimşek, T., Öner, M. A., Kunday, Ö., Olcay, G. A., Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Eskola, R., Semken, R. S., Rantanen, H., Tutak, M., Brodny, J., Lettner, N., Wilhelm, S., Güldenberg, S., Güttel, W., Senyo, P. K., … Bar, H. (2023). A transformational learning framework for sustainable entrepreneurship education: The power of Paulo Freire’s educational model. International Journal of Management Education, 8(1), e12763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12763

Huang, Z., & Kee, D. M. H. (2024). Exploring entrepreneurial intention: The roles of proactive personality, education, opportunity and Planned Behavior. Heliyon, 10(11), e31714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31714

Jena, R. K. (2020). Measuring the impact of business management Student’s attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 107(January), 106275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106275

Johari, J., Shamsudin, F. M., Zainun, N. F. H., Yean, T. F., & Yahya, K. K. (2022). Institutional leadership competencies and job performance: the moderating role of proactive personality. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 1027–1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0280

Kartika Nuringsih, Nuryasman MN, & Jovita Aurellia Rosa. (2022). Mendorong Green Entrepreneurial Intention Melalui Green Economy dan Green Entrepreneurial Orientation. Jurnal Ekonomi, 27(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v27i3.1203

Kasinathan, P., Pugazhendhi, R., Elavarasan, R. M., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Ramanathan, V., Subramanian, S., Kumar, S., Nandhagopal, K., Raghavan, R. R. V., Rangasamy, S., Devendiran, R., & Alsharif, M. H. (2022). Realization of Sustainable Development Goals with Disruptive Technologies by Integrating Industry 5.0, Society 5.0, Smart Cities and Villages. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215258

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. In Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed., Vol. 25, Issue 2). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1401932

Lee, S., Chang, H., & Lee, J. (2024). Construction and demolition waste management and its impacts on the environment and human health: Moving forward sustainability enhancement. Sustainable Cities and Society, 115, 105855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105855

Li, X., Jia, B., Wang, Z., Li, T., & Feng, F. (2024). Residential heat environment in relation to blue-green space sustainability in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 102, 128577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128577

Liang, Z., Qiu, K., Zhuang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Business environment optimization and corporate sustainable innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 71, 106441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106441

Lin, C.-Y., Chau, K. Y., & Moslehpour, M. (2024). Bridging the gap: The nexus of sustainability innovation, knowledge sharing, and green volunteerism for manufacturing entrepreneurial triumph. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100570

Liu, M., Gorgievski, M. J., Zwaga, J., & Paas, F. (2023). How entrepreneurship program characteristics foster students’ study engagement and entrepreneurial career intentions: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 101(May 2022), 102249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102249

Maridiah,Wida Tjutju,Yuniarsih Wibowo, L. (2021). PENGARUH PENDIDIKAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN DAN ORIENTASI KEWIRAUSAHAAN TERHADAP INTENSI BERWIRAUSAHA. Oikos: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, VII(1), 153–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/oikos.v7i1.5930

May, T., & Perry, B. (2022). Social research: Issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2017). Robustness tests for quantitative research. Cambridge University Press.

Nguyen, Q. Do, & Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of entrepreneurial capacity. International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100730

Niza, I. L., Bueno, A. M., Gameiro da Silva, M., & Broday, E. E. (2024). Air quality and ventilation: Exploring solutions for healthy and sustainable urban environments in times of climate change. Results in Engineering, 24, 103157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103157

Orçan, F. (2018). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis : Which One to Use First? 9(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323

Parsons, V. L. (2014a). Stratified sampling. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1–11.

Parsons, V. L. (2014b). Stratified sampling. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1–11.

Ramadani, V., Rahman, M., Salamzadeh, A., & Rahaman, S. (2022). Entrepreneurship Education and Graduates ’ Entrepreneurial Intentions : Does Gender Matter ? A Multi-Group Analysis using AMOS. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 180(April), 121693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121693

Rippa, P., & Secundo, G. (2018). Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, November 2017, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.013

Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304.

sari bida, R. M. (2021). PENGARUH LINGKUNGAN, PENDIDIKAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN DAN PENGGUNAAN E-COMMERCE PADA PENINGKATAN MINAT BERWIRAUSAHA MAHASISWA FEB UPI YAI. Ikraith-Ekonomika, 3(2).

Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business Models for Sustainability: A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272

Snow, R. E. (2012a). Construct validity and constructed-response tests. In Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 45–60). Routledge.

Snow, R. E. (2012b). Construct validity and constructed-response tests. In Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 45–60). Routledge.

Su, W., Zhang, Y., Yin, Y., & Dong, X. (2024). The influence of teacher-student relationship on innovative behavior of graduate student: The role of proactive personality and creative self-efficacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101529

Tantawy, M., Herbert, K., McNally, J. J., Mengel, T., Piperopoulos, P., & Foord, D. (2021). Bringing creativity back to entrepreneurship education: Creative self-efficacy, creative process engagement, and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15(March), e00239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00239

Tingli, L., Ishtiaq, M., Saud, S., & Rasheed, M. Q. (2025). Achieving sustainable development in emerging economies: Interplay between markets, resources, and environment. Renewable Energy, 238, 121941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121941

Tur-Porcar, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mestre, A. L. (2018). Factors affecting entrepreneurship and business sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020452

Ullberg, O. H., Toivanen, S., King, A. C., & Bälter, K. (2024). Using citizen science to explore barriers and facilitators for healthy and sustainable lifestyles in office environments. Health & Place, 90, 103377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103377

Vova-Chatzi, C., Symvoulakis, E., Parpoula, C., Sbarouni, V., & Lionis, C. (2020a). Robustness of the EUROPEP questionnaire as regards data quality, reliability, and construct validity: The Greek experience before and after the economic crisis. Health Policy, 124(8), 856–864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.021

Vova-Chatzi, C., Symvoulakis, E., Parpoula, C., Sbarouni, V., & Lionis, C. (2020b). Robustness of the EUROPEP questionnaire as regards data quality, reliability, and construct validity: The Greek experience before and after the economic crisis. Health Policy, 124(8), 856–864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.021

Wei-, L. C., & Nordin, N. (2019). Green Entrepreneurial Intention of Mba Students: a Malaysian Study. International Journal of Industrial Management, 5, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijim.5.0.2020.5621

Xin, B., & Ma, X. (2023). Gamifying Online Entrepreneurship Education and Digital Entrepreneurial Intentions : An Empirical Study Gamifying Online Entrepreneurship Education and Digital Entrepreneurial Intentions : An Empirical Study. Entertainment Computing, 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100552

Zheng, F., Khan, N. A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19 pandemic and digital higher education: Exploring the impact of proactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacy and online interaction quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 119(August), 105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles