Learning Outcomes in the Era of AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v4i4.434Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, AI in Education, AI Overreliance, Cognitive Understanding, Conceptual RetentionAbstract
This study, “Learning Outcomes in the Era of AI,” examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ cognitive learning of Microsoft Excel calculations and commands. Using a pre-test/post-test design with two instructional approaches—conventional lectures and AI-assisted activities—the findings revealed that students performed better after human-led instruction, while AI-assisted learning resulted in decreased retention and problem-solving ability. The results suggest that excessive reliance on AI may hinder critical thinking and conceptual understanding. Therefore, while AI can support the learning process, its integration must be balanced and guided by educators to ensure meaningful and sustainable learning outcomes.
References
Aguirre Reid, L., et al. (2023). Intelligent tutoring for spreadsheet learning: Adaptive feedback for student success. arXiv preprint.
Ahmed, A., & Abdullah, R. (2023). AI as a cognitive amplifier in education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 45–59.
Astuti, R., & Bhakti, S. (2023). Spreadsheet-based learning media for physics problem-solving. International Research in Physics Education Journal, 4(1), 33–40.
Baillifard, T., et al. (2023). GPT-3 powered tutoring and student learning outcomes. arXiv preprint.
Brown, J. (2019). Critical thinking through trial-and-error in Excel learning. Journal of Computer Applications in Education, 11(2), 50–65.
Cui, Y., et al. (2019). Adaptive learning platforms in education. arXiv preprint.
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence for learning and teaching: A systematic review of educational applications. Computers & Education, 210, 105999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105999
Fabro, M. A., Cruz, L. D., & Santos, J. R. (2024). The impact of AI tools on classroom learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Studies, 18(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jets.2024.03.005
Fabro, R., et al. (2024). Perceptions of generative AI among Filipino students. ResearchGate Publication.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., & Kühn, J. (2023). ChatGPT and education: Opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100135
Lee, D., & Han, J. (2023). Impact of AI chatbots on student learning behaviors: A meta-analysis. AI in Education Quarterly, 5(1), 54–71.
Lee, K., & Han, S. (2023). Impacts of chatbot-assisted learning on student engagement. Journal of Digital Learning Research, 9(1), 112–126.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2023). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Microsoft Corporation. (n.d.). Excel formula functions reference. https://support.microsoft.com/excel
Microsoft News. (2025). DepEd and Microsoft drive AI adoption in Philippine education. Retrieved from https://news.microsoft.com
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT documentation and use in educational settings. https://openai.com/chatgpt
Ortiz Jr., F., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Philippine classrooms: Teacher experiences. ResearchGate Publication.
Ortiz Jr., R. P., Dela Peña, M. L., & Ramos, G. T. (2025). Exploring AI-driven pedagogy in Philippine education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education and Innovation, 12(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/ajpei.2025.12.1.008
Park, S., Lee, J., & Kim, T. (2024). Understanding how generative AI affects students’ self-regulated learning and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370
Renkl, A. (2017). Learning from worked examples: How to prepare students for meaningful problem-solving. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1333435
Reyes, M., & Santos, L. (2022). The effect of digital productivity tools on senior high school learning outcomes. Philippine Journal of ICT Education, 5(1), 23–37.
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., & Schmid, R. F. (2023). The impact of AI-supported instruction on student learning: A meta-analytic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(5), 2571–2593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10291-9
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2023). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00405-1
Zulkarnaen, I., et al. (2024). Spreadsheet-based learning to improve cognitive outcomes. Prismasains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA, 12(1), 66–74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jennifer L. Lamo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
